Clinical factors associated with patterns of endocrine therapy adherence in premenopausal breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer are recommended at least five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, but adherence to this treatment is often suboptimal. We investigated longitudinal trends in adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) adherence among premenopausal breast cancer patients and identified clinical characteristics, including baseline comorbidities and non-cancer chronic medication use, associated with AET adherence. METHODS: We included stage I-III premenopausal breast cancer patients diagnosed during 2002-2011 and registered in the Danish Breast Cancer Group clinical database who initiated AET. We used group-based trajectory modeling to describe AET adherence patterns. We also linked patients to Danish population-based registries and fit multinomial logistic models to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) associating clinical characteristics with AET adherence patterns. RESULTS: We identified three adherence patterns among 4,353 women-high adherers (57%), slow decliners (36%), and rapid decliners (6.9%). Women with stage I disease (vs. stage II; OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.5, 2.5), without chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy; OR: 4.3, 95% CI 3.0, 6.1), with prevalent comorbid disease (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 1 vs. 0; OR: 1.6, 95% CI 1.1, 2.3), and with a history of chronic non-cancer medication use (vs. none; OR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.0, 1.8) were more likely to be rapid decliners compared with high adherers. CONCLUSIONS: Women with stage I cancer, no chemotherapy, higher comorbidity burden, and history of chronic non-cancer medication use were less likely to adhere to AET. Taking steps to promote adherence in these groups of women may reduce their risk of recurrence.

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: a qualitative exploration of attribution of symptoms among post-menopausal women.

PURPOSE: Oral adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is an effective treatment for hormone receptor positive breast cancer to decrease recurrence and mortality, but adherence is poor. This study explored post-menopausal women's experiences with AET, with a particular focus on adherence to AET as well as distress and symptoms experienced prior to and during AET treatment. METHODS: Participants were recruited from a hospital registry, stratified by adherence to/discontinuation of AET. Telephone interviews followed a semi-structured interview guide and were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were systematically coded using team-based coding, with analysis of themes using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Thirty-three participants were interviewed; ages ranged from 57 to 86 years. Participants included 10 discontinued patients and 23 patients who completed their AET course or were adherent to AET at the time of interviewing. Both adherent and discontinued patients reported symptoms throughout their AET treatment course, and both attributed symptoms to factors other than AET (e.g., older age and pre-existing comorbidities). However, discontinued patients were more likely to attribute symptoms to AET and to describe difficulty managing their symptoms, with some directly citing symptoms as the reason for discontinuing AET therapy. Conversely, adherent patients were more likely to describe the necessity of taking AET, despite symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: AET adherence was associated with beliefs about AET, symptom attribution, and symptom management. Routine symptom monitoring during AET and addressing both symptoms and patients' understanding of their symptoms may promote adherence to AET.

Osteoporotic fracture risk in women with breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors: a health insurance claims database study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Hormone therapy with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for estrogen receptor-dependent breast cancer may expose patients to an increased osteoporosis risk. This study was performed to estimate fracture risk in women with breast cancer to whom AIs were prescribed in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the Japanese Medical Data Vision database. Women with breast cancer prescribed AIs over a 12-month period were identified and matched to women not prescribed AIs using a propensity score. Fracture rates were estimated by a cumulative incidence function and compared using a cause-specific Cox hazard model. The proportion of women undergoing bone density tests was retrieved. RESULTS: For all fractures sites combined, cumulative fracture incidence at 10 years was 0.19 [95%CI: 0.16-0.22] in women prescribed AIs and 0.18 [95%CI: 0.15-0.21] without AIs. AI prescription was not associated with any changes in risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.08 [95%CI: 0.99-1.17] p = 0.08). Women prescribed AI more frequently underwent bone density testing (31.9% [95% CI: 31.2%; 32.6%] versus 2.2% [95% CI: 2.0%; 2.4%]). CONCLUSIONS: The anticipated association between AI exposure and osteoporotic fracture risk in Japanese women with breast cancer was not seen clearly.

[Drastic changes in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer]. / Behandling av metastaserad prostatacancer.

The treatment of metastatic prostate  cancer has seen drastic changes in the recent years with more intense treatment at initial diagnose. The new standard is combination therapy with castration as the backbone and the addition of new hormonal therapies with or without chemotherapy. For patients with minimal metastatic spread it is also recommended to give radiotherapy to the primary tumour. Since many patients now can look forward to longer survival it is paramount to take care of the side-effects of the treatments, where focus is on cardiovascular disease and bone health management. Precision medicine has started also in prostate cancer; testing of BRCA1/2 mutation is mandatory for treatment with PARP inhibitors.

Hormone receptor mRNA and protein levels as predictors of premenopausal tamoxifen benefit.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tamoxifen remains an important adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Thus, determination of hormone receptors is important. Here, we compare cytosol-based methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and gene expression (GEX) analysis for determining hormone receptor status in premenopausal breast cancer patients from a randomised tamoxifen trial, to evaluate their performance in identifying patients that benefit from tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal patients (n=564) were randomised to 2 years of tamoxifen or no systemic treatment. Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status by protein expression measured by cytosol-based methods and IHC, and mRNA by GEX analysis were compared in 313 patients with available data from all methods. Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox regression were used to evaluate the treatment-predictive value for recurrence-free interval (RFi) and overall survival (OS). Median follow-up for event-free patients was 26 (RFi) and 33 (OS) years. RESULTS: The mRNA data of ESR1 and PGR distributed bimodally, patterns confirmed in an independent cohort. Kappa-values between all methods were 0.76 and 0.79 for ER and PR, respectively. Tamoxifen improved RFi in patients with ER-positive (ER+) or PR-positive (PR+) tumours (Hazard Ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]), cytosol-ER+ 0.53 [0.36-0.79]; IHC-ER+ 0.55 [0.38-0.79]; GEX-ER+ 0.54 [0.37-0.77]; cytosol-PR+ 0.49 [0.34-0.72]; IHC-PR+ 0.58 [0.40-0.85]; GEX-PR+ 0.55 [0.38-0.80]). Results were similar for OS. INTERPRETATION: These methods can all identify patients that benefit from 2 years of tamoxifen with equal performance, indicating that GEX data might be used to guide adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

Ovarian Suppression: Early Menopause and Late Effects.

OPINION STATEMENT: Around 90% of breast tumours are diagnosed in the early stage, with approximately 70% being hormone receptor-positive. The cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is endocrine therapy, tailored according to disease stage, biological characteristics of the tumour, patient's comorbidities, preferences and age. In premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ovarian function suppression is a key component of the adjuvant endocrine treatment in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen. Moreover, it can be used during chemotherapy as a standard strategy for ovarian function preservation in all breast cancer subtypes. In the metastatic setting, ovarian function suppression should be used in all premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to achieve a post-menopausal status. Despite its efficacy, ovarian function suppression may lead to several side effects that can have a major negative impact on patients' quality of life if not properly managed (e.g. hot flashes, depression, cognitive impairment, osteoporosis, sexual dysfunction, weight gain). A deep knowledge of the side effects of ovarian function suppression is necessary for clinicians. A correct counselling in this regard and proactive management should be considered a fundamental part of survivorship care to improve treatment adherence and patients' quality of life.

Omission of adjuvant radiotherapy in low-risk elderly males with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized clinical trials demonstrate that lumpectomy + hormone therapy (HT) without radiation therapy (RT) yields equivalent survival and acceptable local-regional outcomes in elderly women with early-stage, node-negative, hormone-receptor positive (HR +) breast cancer. Whether these data apply to men with the same inclusion criteria remains unknown. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for male patients ≥ 65 years with pathologic T1-2N0 (≤ 3 cm) HR + breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery with negative margins from 2004 to 2019. Adjuvant treatment was classified as HT alone, RT alone, or HT + RT. Male patients were matched with female patients for OS comparison. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression and Kaplan - Meier method. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: A total of 523 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 24.4% receiving HT, 16.3% receiving RT, and 59.2% receiving HT + RT. The median follow-up was 6.9 years (IQR: 5.0-9.4 years). IPTW-adjusted 5-yr OS rates in the HT, RT, and HT + RT cohorts were 84.0% (95% CI 77.1-91.5%), 81.1% (95% CI 71.1-92.5%), and 93.0% (95% CI 90.0-96.2%), respectively. On IPTW-adjusted MVA, relative to HT, receipt of HT + RT was associated with improvements in OS (HR: 0.641; p = 0.042). RT alone was not associated with improved OS (HR: 1.264; p = 0.420). CONCLUSION: Among men ≥ 65 years old with T1-2N0 HR + breast cancer, RT alone did not confer an OS benefit over HT alone. Combination of RT + HT demonstrated significant improvements in OS. De-escalation of treatment through omission of either RT or HT at this point should be done with caution.

Clinically relevant gene signatures provide independent prognostic information in older breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of gene signatures in older breast cancer patients remains unclear. We aimed to determine signature prognostic capacity in this patient subgroup. METHODS: Research versions of the genomic grade index (GGI), 70-gene, recurrence score (RS), cell cycle score (CCS), PAM50 risk-of-recurrence proliferation (ROR-P), and PAM50 signatures were applied to 39 breast cancer datasets (N = 9583). After filtering on age ≥ 70 years, and the presence of estrogen receptor (ER) and survival data, 871 patients remained. Signature prognostic capacity was tested in all (n = 871), ER-positive/lymph node-positive (ER + /LN + , n = 335) and ER-positive/lymph node-negative (ER + /LN-, n = 374) patients using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox-proportional hazard (PH) modelling. RESULTS: All signatures were statistically significant in Kaplan-Meier analysis of all patients (Log-rank P < 0.001). This significance remained in multivariable analysis (Cox-PH, P ≤ 0.05). In ER + /LN + patients all signatures except PAM50 were significant in Kaplan-Meier analysis (Log-rank P ≤ 0.05) and remained so in multivariable analysis (Cox-PH, P ≤ 0.05). In ER + /LN- patients all except RS were significant in Kaplan-Meier analysis (Log-rank P ≤ 0.05) but only the 70-gene, CCS, ROR-P, and PAM50 signatures remained so in multivariable analysis (Cox-PH, P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found that gene signatures provide prognostic information in survival analyses of all, ER + /LN + and ER + /LN- older (≥ 70 years) breast cancer patients, suggesting a potential role in aiding treatment decisions in older patients.

Mammalian enabled protein enhances tamoxifen sensitivity of the hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients by suppressing the AKT signaling pathway.

BACKGROUND: Mammalian enabled (MENA) protein is a member of the enabled/vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (Ena/VASP) protein family, which regulates cytoplasmic actin network assembly. It plays a significant role in breast cancer invasion, migration, and resistance against targeted therapy and chemotherapy. However, its role in the efficacy of endocrine therapy for the hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients is not known. This study investigated the role of MENA in the resistance against tamoxifen therapy in patients with HR+ breast cancer and the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: MENA expression levels in the clinical HR+ breast cancer samples (n = 119) were estimated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine its association with the clinicopathological features, tamoxifen resistance, and survival outcomes. Western blotting (WB) and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis was performed to estimate the MENA protein and mRNA levels in the tamoxifen-sensitive and -resistant HR+ breast cancer cell lines. Furthermore, CCK8, colony formation, and the transwell invasion and migration assays were used to analyze the effects of MENA knockdown on the biological behavior and tamoxifen sensitivity of the HR+ breast cancer cell lines. Xenograft tumor experiments were performed in the nude mice to determine the tumor growth rates and tamoxifen sensitivity of the control and MENA knockdown HR+ breast cancer cells in the presence and absence of tamoxifen treatment. Furthermore, we estimated the growth rates of organoids derived from the HR+ breast cancer patients (n = 10) with high and low MENA expression levels when treated with tamoxifen. RESULTS: HR+ breast cancer patients with low MENA expression demonstrated tamoxifen resistance and poorer prognosis compared to those with high MENA expression. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that MENA expression was an independent predictor of tamoxifen resistance in patients with HR+ breast cancer. MENA knockdown HR+ breast cancer cells showed significantly reduced tamoxifen sensitivity in the in vitro experiments and the in vivo xenograft tumor mouse model compared with the corresponding controls. Furthermore, MENA knockdown increased the in vitro invasion and migration of the HR+ breast cancer cells. HR+ breast cancer organoids with low MENA expression demonstrated reduced tamoxifen sensitivity than those with higher MENA expression. Mechanistically, P-AKT levels were significantly upregulated in the MENA-knockdown HR + breast cancer cells treated with or without 4-OHT compared with the corresponding controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that downregulation of MENA promoted tamoxifen resistance in the HR+ breast cancer tissues and cells by enhancing the AKT signaling pathway. Therefore, MENA is a promising prediction biomarker for determining tamoxifen sensitivity in patients with HR+ breast cancer.

Development of depression in patients using androgen deprivation therapy: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an effective treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Multiple studies have highlighted serious consequences this therapy poses to mental health, particularly depression. We aimed to review the incidence and association between ADT in men with PCa and the risk of depression. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus till August 2023 for studies that compared ADT versus control for treating PCa reporting depression as outcome. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and results presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies (17 retrospective studies, 16 prospective studies, two cross-sectional studies and two randomized trials) with 360,650 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The estimated pooled incidence of depression among ADT patients is 209.5 (95% CI = 122.3; 312.2) per 1000 patients. There is statistically significant relationship between ADT treatment and depression (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.28, 1.67; p = 0, I2 = 86.4%). The results remained consistent across various subgroups. No risk of publication bias was detected by funnel plot and Eggers's test (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There is a higher risk of depression for men receiving ADT. Further studies evaluating optimal treatments for depression in men on ADT are warranted.

Analysis of TLR2 in Primary Endocrine Resistant of Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical studies have suggested that Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 had predictive function for endocrine resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer (BCa). Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether TLR2 would relate to development of endocrine therapy resistance in triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC). METHODS: Bioinformatic analysis of TLR2 was carried out through a database. Ten tumor tissues were obtained from TPBC patients who underwent surgery, with five patients displaying primary resistance to tamoxifen (TAM) with the remaining 5 being sensitive. Different levels of proteins were identified through mass spectrometry analysis and confirmed through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blot. TAM-resistant cell lines (BT474-TAM) were established by continuous exposure to TAM, and TAM resistance was assessed via IC50. Additionally, TLR2 mRNA was analyzed through western blot and RT-PCR in BT474, BT474-TAM, MCF-7, and MCF10A cells. Furthermore, TLR2-specific interference sequences were utilized to downregulate TLR2 expression in BT474-TAM cells to elucidate its role in TAM resistance. RESULTS: TLR2 had a correlation with decreased relapse-free survival in BCa patients from the GSE1456-GPL96 cohort, and it was involved in cancer development predominantly mediated by MAPK and PI3K pathways. TLR2 protein expression ranked in the top 5 proteins within the TAM-resistant group, and was 1.9 times greater than that in the sensitive group. Additionally, TLR2 mRNA and protein expression increased significantly in the established TAM-resistant BT474/TAM cell lines. The sensitivity of TAM was restored upon TLR2 downregulation in BT474/TAM cells. CONCLUSIONS: TLR2 might have a therapeutic value as it was involved in the TAM resistance in TPBC, with potential to be a marker for primary endocrine resistance.

Targeting systemic and gut microbial metabolism in ER+ breast cancer.

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast tumors have a better overall prognosis than ER- tumors; however, there is a sustained risk of recurrence. Mounting evidence indicates that genetic and epigenetic changes associated with resistance impact critical signaling pathways governing cell metabolism. This review delves into recent literature concerning the metabolic pathways regulated in ER+ breast tumors by the availability of nutrients and endocrine therapies and summarizes research on how changes in systemic and gut microbial metabolism can affect ER activity and responsiveness to endocrine therapy. As targeting of metabolic pathways using dietary or pharmacological approaches enters the clinic, we provide an overview of the supporting literature and suggest future directions.

Recovery of adrenal function after stopping mitotane in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Mitotane is the standard therapy of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) due to its relative selectivity of its cytotoxic effects toward adrenocortical cells. Therefore, it virtually always leads to adrenal insufficiency. Frequency and characteristics of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis recovery after discontinuation are ill-defined. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with ACC adjuvantly treated with mitotane for ≥12 months who were disease-free at mitotane stop and had a minimum follow-up ≥1 year. Primary endpoint was adrenal recovery. Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictive factors. Moreover, mitotane plasma elimination rate and hormonal changes after mitotane stop were investigated. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (36 women) treated with mitotane for a median time of 25 months and an average daily dose of 2.8 g were included. Median time after discontinuation until mitotane levels dropped below 5 and 2 mg/L, and the detection limit was 152 days (interquartile range: 114-202), 280 days (192-370), and 395 days (227-546), respectively. Full adrenal recovery was documented in 32 (57%) patients after a median time of 26 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 19.6-32.4). In 4 patients (7.1%), adrenal insufficiency persisted >5 years after discontinuation. Mitotane peak ≥ 27 mg/L significantly correlated with longer time to adrenal recovery (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.1-0.8, P = .03). Twenty-seven of 38 patients (71%) followed in reference centers achieved adrenal recovery compared with only 5/18 (28%) followed up in non-reference centers (HR = 4.51, 95% CI = 1.71-11.89, P = .002). Other investigated factors were not associated with adrenal function after discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that adrenal recovery occurs in most patients after stopping mitotane, particularly when followed up in specialized centers, but not in all. Elimination time of mitotane after treatment discontinuation is very long but individually quite variable.

Phase I Study of ORIC-101, a Glucocorticoid Receptor Antagonist, in Combination with Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Progressing on Enzalutamide.

PURPOSE: Increased glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signaling is a proposed compensatory mechanism of resistance to androgen receptor (AR) inhibition in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). ORIC-101 is a potent and selective orally-bioavailable GR antagonist. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Safety, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, and antitumor activity of ORIC-101 in combination with enzalutamide were studied in patients with mCRPC progressing on enzalutamide. ORIC-101 doses ranging from 80 to 240 mg once daily were tested in combination with enzalutamide 160 mg once daily. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics was assessed after a single dose and at steady state. Disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks was evaluated at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were enrolled. There were no dose-limiting toxicities and the RP2D was selected as 240 mg of ORIC-101 and 160 mg of enzalutamide daily. At the RP2D, the most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (38.7%), nausea (29.0%), decreased appetite (19.4%), and constipation (12.9%). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data confirmed ORIC-101 achieved exposures necessary for GR target engagement. Overall, for 31 patients treated at the RP2D, there was insufficient clinical benefit based on DCR (25.8%; 80% confidence interval: 15.65-38.52) which did not meet the prespecified target rate, leading to termination of the study. Exploratory subgroup analyses based on baseline GR expression, presence of AR resistance variants, and molecular features of aggressive variant prostate cancer suggested possible benefit in patients with high GR expression and no other resistance markers, although this would require confirmation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the combination of ORIC-101 and enzalutamide demonstrated an acceptable tolerability profile, GR target inhibition with ORIC-101 did not produce clinical benefit in men with metastatic prostate cancer resistant to enzalutamide.

Hemostatic imbalance induced by tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER+) breast cancer accounts for approximately 75% of all breast cancers. Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is the standard adjuvant treatment. Although better tolerated than aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) 1.4-fold. AIM: To assess the hemostatic imbalance induced by tamoxifen in adjuvant treatment of ER+ breast cancer. METHOD: Twenty-five patients in remission from ER+ breast cancer under tamoxifen were included. One hundred and thirty one age- and BMI-matched healthy controls were included to establish reference ranges of thrombin generation assay (TGA) parameters. TGA was performed in the absence and presence of exogenous activated protein C (APC) to calculate the normalized APC sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr), a marker of APC resistance. RESULTS: All TG parameters except the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) (-APC) were significantly impacted by tamoxifen (p < 0.001). In absence of APC, regardless of TGA parameters, at least 50% of results were outside the reference ranges except for ETP, which was above the upper reference limit in only two individuals. The most impacted parameter was the Peak Height with 52% (-APC) and 80% (+APC) of results above the upper reference range limit, respectively. The nAPCsr was significantly higher in tamoxifen users (mean ± standard deviation = 3.18 ± 0.91) compared to the control group (2.19 ± 0.92, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This observational study showed that patients in remission from ER+ breast cancer taking tamoxifen had altered thrombin generation, as well as an acquired APC resistance. Moreover, this is the first study using the validated ETP-based APC resistance assay in tamoxifen-treated patients.

Current and emerging treatment approaches for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

In the past decade, significant progress was made in treating hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), but many clinical questions remain. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors are now widely used in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) as standard of care, having demonstrated significant progression-free survival versus ET, and also significant overall survival benefits in the metastatic setting. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR intracellular signaling pathway coupled with ET typically follows first-line therapies. Novel endocrine options including oral selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs) are in late phases of development, with elacestrant being the first oral SERD to be approved for ESR1-mutant mBC. However, endocrine-refractory disease is inevitable in most patients and represents an area of unmet need, with current recommended options offering poor efficacy, undesirable toxicity, and reduced quality of life. Breakthrough advances in the metastatic setting came via the development of antibody-drug conjugates, which have the advantage of delivering cytotoxic payloads to tumor cells with higher tumor selectivity. Trastuzumab deruxtecan offers a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC and sacituzumab govitecan is a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC, including those with unmet treatment need in the later-line endocrine-refractory setting. Data gaps still exist regarding optimal sequencing of these novel agents; additional studies into mechanisms of resistance in the metastatic setting would provide further insights. Herein, we describe the current treatment options for HR+/HER2- mBC, including the latest practice-impacting data, and provide commentary on future directions.

Ginsenoside Rg3 overcomes tamoxifen resistance through inhibiting glycolysis in breast cancer cells.

Tamoxifen (TAM) resistance poses a significant clinical challenge in human breast cancer and exhibits high heterogeneity among different patients. Rg3, an original ginsenoside known to inhibit tumor growth, has shown potential for enhancing TAM sensitivity in breast cancer cells. However, the specific role and underlying mechanisms of Rg3 in this context remain unclear. Aerobic glycolysis, a metabolic process, has been implicated in chemotherapeutic resistance. In this study, we demonstrate that elevated glycolysis plays a central role in TAM resistance and can be effectively targeted and overcome by Rg3. Mechanistically, we observed upregulation of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3), a key mediator of glycolysis, in TAM-resistant MCF-7/TamR and T-47D/TamR cells. Crucially, PFKFB3 is indispensable for the synergistic effect of TAM and Rg3 combination therapy, which suppresses cell proliferation and glycolysis in MCF-7/TamR and T-47D/TamR cells, both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, overexpression of PFKFB3 in MCF-7 cells mimicked the TAM resistance phenotype. Importantly, combination treatment significantly reduced TAM-resistant MCF-7 cell proliferation in an in vivo model. In conclusion, this study highlights the contribution of Rg3 in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of TAM in breast cancer, and suggests that targeting TAM-resistant PFKFB3 overexpression may represent a promising strategy to improve the response to combination therapy in breast cancer.

Breast density reduction as a predictor for prognosis in premenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of the updated ASTRRA study.

BACKGROUND: While the relationship between mammographic breast density reduction (MDR) and endocrine therapy efficacy has been reported in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, it is still unclear in premenopausal women, especially in the case of adding ovarian function suppression (OFS) to antihormone therapy. The authors investigated the impact of MDR on prognosis stratified by treatment based on the updated results of the ASTRRA trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ASTRRA trial, a randomized phase III study, showed that adding OFS to tamoxifen (TAM) improved survival in premenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer after chemotherapy. The authors updated survival outcomes and assessed mammography before treatment and the annual follow-up mammography for up to 5 years after treatment initiation. Mammographic density (MD) was classified into four categories based on the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System. MDR-positivity was defined as a downgrade in MD grade on follow-up mammography up to 2 years after randomization, with pretreatment MD grade as a reference. RESULTS: The authors evaluated MDR in 944 of the 1282 patients from the trial, and 813 (86.2%) had grade III or IV MD. There was no difference in the MDR-positivity rate between the two treatment groups [TAM-only group (106/476 (22.3%)) vs. TAM+OFS group (89/468 (19.0%)); P =0.217). MDR-positivity was significantly associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) in the TAM+OFS group (estimated 8-year DFS: 93.1% in MDR-positive vs. 82.0% in MDR-negative patients; HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.16-0.85; P =0.019), but not in the TAM-only group ( Pinteraction =0.039). MDR-positive patients who received TAM+OFS had a favorable DFS compared to MDR-negative patients who received only TAM (HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.13-0.70; P =0.005). CONCLUSION: Although the proportion of MDR-positive patients was comparable between both treatment groups, MDR-positivity was independently associated with favorable outcomes only in the TAM+OFS group.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy With Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer in China.

PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy combined with ovarian function suppression (OFS) is recommended in intermediate- or high-risk patients among premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. However, in China, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy compared with endocrine therapy alone is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of tamoxifen (TAM), TAM+OFS, and exemestane plus OFS (EXE+OFS). METHODS: On the basis of prognostic data from the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT), cost data from the Hospital Information System of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and health utility values from the published literature, a Markov model was established. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to compare the treatment strategies. RESULTS: In a 25-year simulation of adjuvant therapy in Chinese women with early breast cancer, the total costs of TAM, TAM+OFS, and EXE+OFS were $7821, $9318, and $9445, respectively. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were 11.615, 11.896, and 11.734 years, respectively. Compared with TAM, the ICERs of TAM+OFS and EXE+OFS were $5,327.4021/QALY and $13,647.0588/QALY, respectively. The ICERs of TAM+OFS and EXE+OFS were below the threshold of $32,517/QALY. The reliability and stability of the simulation results were verified using Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: In the context of limited resources in China, TAM+OFS and EXE+OFS are cost-effective options compared with TAM.